674 results for search: %EA%B4%91%EA%B3%A0%EB%AC%B8%EC%9D%98%E2%96%B7%E0%B4%A0%E2%9D%B6%E0%B4%A0%E3%85%A1%E2%9D%BD%E2%9D%BD%E2%9D%BC%E2%9D%BB%E3%85%A1%E2%9D%BD%E2%9D%BC%E2%9D%BC%E2%9D%BD%E2%96%B7%EA%B8%B0%EA%B3%84%EB%A9%B4%EA%B0%90%EC%84%B1%EB%A7%88%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%80%E3%81%8D%EA%B4%91%EA%B3%A0%E2%94%AE%EB%AC%B8%EC%9D%98%E2%86%82%EA%B8%B0%EA%B3%84%EB%A9%B4%E7%9C%98%EA%B0%90%EC%84%B1%EB%A7%88%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%80%E5%A6%B8emendatory/feed/rss2/press-release-chad-2010jan
RustConf 2019, and systems programming as a data scientist
Truth and Myth in Sierra Leone: An Empirical Analysis of the Conflict, 1991–2000
Tamy Guberek, Daniel Guzmán, Romesh Silva, Kristen Cibelli, Jana Asher, Scott Weikart, Patrick Ball, and Wendy Grossman. “Truth and Myth in Sierra Leone: An Empirical Analysis of the Conflict, 1991–2000″ (pdf). A report by the Benetech Human Rights Data Analysis Group and the American Bar Association. March 28, 2006.
Judges in Habré Trial Cite HRDAG Analysis
State Violence in Guatemala, 1960-1996: A Quantitative Reflection
Patrick Ball, Paul Kobrak, Herbert F. Spirer. State Violence in Guatemala, 1960-1996: A Quantitative Reflection. © 1999 American Association for the Advancement of Science. [pdf – english] [pdf – español]
New UN report counts 191,369 Syrian-war deaths — but the truth is probably much, much worse
Amanda Taub of Vox has interviewed HRDAG executive director about the UN Office of the High Commissioner of Human Right’s release of HRDAG’s third report on reported killings in the Syrian conflict.
From the article:
Patrick Ball, Executive Director of the Human Rights Data Analysis Group and one of the report’s authors, explained to me that this new report is not a statistical estimate of the number of people killed in the conflict so far. Rather, it’s an actual list of specific victims who have been identified by name, date, and location of death. (The report only tracked violent killings, not “excess mortality” deaths from from disease or hunger that the conflict is causing indirectly.)
Data ‘hashing’ improves estimate of the number of victims in databases
But while HRDAG’s estimate relied on the painstaking efforts of human workers to carefully weed out potential duplicate records, hashing with statistical estimation proved to be faster, easier and less expensive. The researchers said hashing also had the important advantage of a sharp confidence interval: The range of error is plus or minus 1,772, or less than 1 percent of the total number of victims.
“The big win from this method is that we can quickly calculate the probable number of unique elements in a dataset with many duplicates,” said Patrick Ball, HRDAG’s director of research. “We can do a lot with this estimate.”
Timor-Leste 2006 – Combining Found Data and Innovative Surveys To Uncover the Truth
Measures of Fairness for New York City’s Supervised Release Risk Assessment Tool
Kristian Lum and Tarak Shah (2019). Measures of Fairness for New York City’s Supervised Release Risk Assessment Tool. Human Rights Data Analysis Group. 1 October 2019. © HRDAG 2019.
Report on Measures of Fairness in NYC Risk Assessment Tool
Reflections: A Love Letter to HRDAG
HRDAG Names New Board Member William Isaac
Lessons at HRDAG: Holding Public Institutions Accountable
Accountability at home and abroad
In Colombia: HRDAG and Dejusticia on the Importance of Missing Data
Seeking the Truth with Documentation
Civilian killings and disappearances during civil war in El Salvador (1980–1992)
Amelia Hoover Green and Patrick Ball (2019). Civilian killings and disappearances during civil war in El Salvador (1980–1992). Demographic Research, 1 October 2019. © 2019 Demographic Research. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.27