Colombia
Data integration and statistical estimation: A collaboration with the Colombian Truth Commission (CEV) and the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)
The Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) guerrilla group reached a Peace Agreement in 2016, which created the Commission for the Clarification of the Truth, Coexistence and Non-Repetition (CEV). The objective of this temporary institution was to discover the truth of what happened in the context of the armed conflict.
2020–2022: The Truth Commission joined with the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) and HRDAG in the “Joint JEP-CEV-HRDAG data integration and statistical estimation” project. This project aimed to produce official statistical information on the magnitude and patterns of violence in the context of the Colombian armed conflict and ended with the publication of the Final Report of the Truth Commission.
In 2023, Alejandro Valencia Villa, a Former Commissioner of the Colombian Truth Commission, wrote a letter describing the Joint Project and its importance for understanding the armed conflict in Colombia. [English and Spanish].
One of the principal outputs of the Joint Project was the Methodological Report (sometimes referred to as the Technical Appendix), which details the analyses carried out in the project. The most recent version of the Methodological Report, dated March 6, 2025, is available in Spanish and English. This updated version (6 March, 2025) corrects small errors found in the previous versions of the report. The original version of the Spanish report, dated August 2, 2022 is available on the CEV website. The first revised version of the Spanish report, dated 18 August, 2022, is available here. We have also prepared answers to some frequently asked questions (FAQs) in Spanish and English.
Two anonymized versions of the databases of victims of disappearance, forced recruitment, homicide, and kidnapping have been published. The first version (v1) of the data corresponds to the original version of the data used for the analyses in the Methodological Report of the Joint Project. These data are useful for replicating the analyses in the Methodological Report. The second version (v2) of the data corrects some errors where individuals were erroneously included as direct victims when they should not have been. The v2 data is appropriate for researchers wishing to design their own analyses of the conflict.
Download data to replicate analyses conducted in the Methodological Report (v1 of the data)
Download data from the Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE), the national statistics office in Colombia: https://microdatos.dane.gov.co/index.php/catalog/795/get-microdata
Download data from HRDAG via IPFS:
- Disappearance [csv] [parquet]
- Forced recruitment [csv] [parquet]
- Homicide [csv] [parquet]
- Kidnapping [csv] [parquet]
Download data to design your own analyses of the armed conflict in Colombia (v2 of the data)
Download data from HRDAG via IPFS:
- Disappearance [csv] [parquet]
- Forced recruitment [csv] [parquet]
- Homicide [csv] [parquet]
- Kidnapping [csv] [parquet]
We have produced a memo outlining what the changes in the v2 data mean for the results presented in the Methodological Report. In short, these changes change our estimate of overall underreporting for both homicides and enforced disappearances. They do not change any of the results presented for child recruitment or kidnapping, nor do they impact our analyses about the proportional disaggregation of the estimates (e.g., the proportion of violations carried out by each presumed perpetrator). The memo is available in Spanish and English.
To facilitate the correct use of the data, we have created the verdata package for the R statistical programming language. The package is currently available for download on GitHub and will soon be available on CRAN. In 2024, we published a peer-reviewed article in the Journal of Open Source Software to accompany the package. A repository of worked examples using the v1 data to replicate some key results from the Methodological Report is also available on GitHub, but they are still under development.
Learn more about the project:
- Analyzing Patterns Of Violence In Colombia Using More Than 100 Databases [Spanish version]
- Capítulo 8 – Camino al Informe: La trascendencia de los datos del conflicto
- Building Capacity in Colombia: Truth And Reconciliation
- Making Missing Data Visible In Colombia
- Can The Armed Conflict Become Part of Colombia’s History?
- In Colombia: HRDAG And Dejusticia On the Importance Of Missing Data
How Many Social Movement Leaders Have Been Killed in Colombia?
The killing of social movement leaders has been widely documented in Colombia, particularly since the Peace Agreement in 2016. Documentation organizations do not agree on the exact number of killings. In 2019, researchers Valentina Rozo Ángel and Patrick Ball wrote in a blogpost, “We find that between 2016 and 2018, the estimated killings grew approximately 71% (from 166 to 284).”
2018: Using data from six organizations, this report estimates the total number of social movement leaders killed in 2016 and 2017. We conclude that the number of killings is increasing. More precisely, we estimate that there is a 50 percent probability that the increase between 2016-2017 was 10 percent or greater. HRDAG has drafted and published this report in partnership with Dejusticia. This is a first analysis of lethal violence against social movement leaders, and it extends earlier work HRDAG did to estimate the total number of murdered trade unionists.
2019: Using multiple system estimation (MSE), we estimate the total population of social movement leaders killed in Colombia during 2018. This work expands our previous document “Asesinato de líderes sociales en 2016 y 2017: una estimación del universo,” in which we estimated the universe of victims for 2016 and 2017. [report in English] [report in Spanish]
2024: In February, 2024, the Constitutional Court of Colombia published the long version of its decision related to social movement leaders. The 2019 HRDAG-Dejusticia report was cited under a section called ‘The Protection of the Population that Defends Human Rights Is an Imperative of the Social and Democratic State of Law.”
2024: In December, 2024, the third report, “The killings of social movement leaders and human rights defenders in Colombia 2018 – 2023: an estimate of the universe,” found that there has been a decrease in the estimated universe of killings since 2020. Author Valentina Rozo Ángel noted, “Although the 2023 estimate is the lowest since 2020, it is considerably higher than that of 2016, when we started doing this exercise.” The year 2020 saw 338 documented homicides, but the report estimates that between 342 and 496 social movement leaders were murdered.
The Disappeared in the Palace of Justice
This memo (November, 2013) explains how HRDAG helped the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) to present evidence against the Colombian Army in support of the plaintiff, families of nine civilians who worked in the Palace cafeteria and were disappeared and possibly tortured during a two-day siege of the Palace of Justice in 1985.
Conflict-Related Sexual Violence
In 2011 HRDAG issued a report with the Colombian NGO Corporación Punto de Vista, examining how quantitative data can be used to assess conflict related sexual violence in Colombia. This paper, “Using Quantitative Data to Assess Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in Colombia: Challenges and Opportunities,” (Roth, Guberek, Hoover Green) notes that sexual violations are notoriously difficult forms of violence to measure. The authors point out that misinterpretation of the available data may create false impressions of reliability and lead to incorrect interpretations that promote unsound policy assessments, misallocation of resources and potential attacks by critics.
Union Violence
In 2010 HRDAG released a paper that examines an academic article, “Is Violence Against Union Members in Colombia Systematic and Targeted?” written by Colombian academics Daniel Mejía and María José Uribe. That paper concluded that “. . . on average, violence against unionists in Colombia is neither systematic nor targeted.”
“Comments to the article ‘Is Violence Against Union Members in Colombia Systematic and Targeted?’” (Price and Guzmán) engages an important academic debate, where the magnitude, patterns and causes of anti-union violence in Colombia are not yet conclusive. This dialogue has important implications for human rights in Colombia where thousands of union leaders and members have been killed, disappeared and threatened for decades.
The public debate about union violence intensified from 2008 to 2010 as countries negotiating free trade agreements with Colombia, including the U.S., explicitly cited union violence as an obstacle to finalizing agreements. Given the importance of this debate, any study that makes claims about the patterns and magnitude of union violence in Colombia requires the highest level of precision and scientific rigor.
In their response, Price and Guzmán present – in technical and methodological detail – the reasons they find the conclusions in Mejía and Uribe’s study to be overstated. Price and Guzmán believe that weaknesses in the data, in the choice of the statistical model, and the interpretation of the model used in Mejía and Uribe’s study, all raise serious questions about the authors’ strong causal conclusions.
Price and Guzmán point out that unchecked, those conclusions distort the truth about violence against unions and can mislead important social, economic and political decisions in Colombia. The authors believe that more examination is needed to determine patterns and magnitude of union homicides in Colombia -and that Mejía and Uribe’s study does not resolve the question, “is violence against union members in Colombia systematic and targeted?”
Deaths and Disappearances
Information on HRDAG reports estimating the magnitude and the patterns of deaths and disappearances in Casanare, Colombia: English and español.
Unidentified Deaths
Information on the HRDAG pilot study that uses cemetery data in Rionegro, Antioquia, Colombia: English and español.
Claims of Declining Lethal Violence
Information on the 2007 paper: English and español.
Publications
> Valentina Rozo Ángel and Patrick Ball. 2024. The killings of social movement leaders and human rights defenders in Colombia 2018 – 2023: an estimate of the universe. Human Rights Data Analysis Group. 18 December 2024. © HRDAG 2024. Creative Commons International license 4.0.
> The Special Jurisdiction for Peace; the Commission for the Clarification of Truth, Coexistence and Non-Repetition; and HRDAG. 2022. Informe metodológico del proyecto conjunto JEP-CEV-HRDAG de integración de datos y estimación estadística. JEP-CEV-HRDAG. 18 August, 2022.
> Valentina Rozo Ángel and Patrick Ball. 2019. Killings of social movement leaders in Colombia: an estimation of the total population of victims – update 2018. Human Rights Data Analysis Group. 10 December 2019. © HRDAG 2019. [English] [español]
> Patrick Ball, César Rodríguez and Valentina Rozo. 2018. Asesinatos de líderes sociales en Colombia en 2016–2017: una estimación del universo. Dejusticia and Human Rights Data Analysis Group. August 2018. © 2018 HRDAG. Creative Commons.
> Patrick Ball and Michael Reed Hurtado. 2016. Criminality registration and measurement. The problem of missing data, and the use of science to produce estimations relating to homicide in Colombia, as demonstrated with an example from one of its administrative and political divisions: the Department of Antioquia (2003-2011). Revista Criminalidad, 58 (1): 9-23.
> Patrick Ball y Michael Reed Hurtado. 2015. Cuentas y mediciones de la criminalidad y de la violencia. Forensis 16, no. 1 (July): 529-545. © 2015 Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses (República de Colombia).
> Françoise Roth, Tamy Guberek, and Amelia Hoover Green. 2011. “Using Quantitative Data to Assess Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in Colombia: Challenges and Opportunities.” A report by the Benetech Human Rights Program and Corporación Punto de Vista. 22 March. (Spanish.) © 2011 Benetech. Creative Commons BY-NC-SA.
> Megan Price and Daniel Guzmán. 2010. “Comments to the article ‘Is Violence Against Union Members in Colombia Systematic and Targeted?’” 28 May. (en español) © 2010 Benetech. CC BY-NC-SA. Executive Summary (English) (español)
> Tamy Guberek, Daniel Guzmán, Megan Price, Kristian Lum and Patrick Ball. 2010. “To Count the Uncounted: An Estimation of Lethal Violence in Casanare,” A Report by the Benetech Human Rights Program. 10 February. (Available in Spanish) © 2010 Benetech. Creative Commons BY-NC-SA.
> Tamy Guberek, Daniel Guzmán, and Beatriz Vejarano. 2010. “Using Cemetery Information in the Search for the Disappeared: Lessons from a Pilot Study in Rionegro, Antioquia.” In Methodological Proposals for Documenting and Searching for Missing Persons in Colombia. (Available in Spanish) © 2010 EQUITAS. All rights reserved.
> Patrick Ball, Tamy Guberek, Daniel Guzmán, Amelia Hoover, and Meghan Lynch. 2007. “Assessing Claims of Declining Lethal Violence in Colombia.” Benetech. En español: “Para Evaluar Afirmaciones Sobre la Reducción de la Violencia Letal en Colombia.”
> Daniel Guzmán, Tamy Guberek, Amelia Hoover, and Patrick Ball. 2007. “Missing People in Casanare.” Benetech. En español – “Los Desaparecidos de Casanare.”
Datasets
View datasets for reports estimating the magnitude and the patterns of human rights violations studied in the JEP-CEV-HRDAG Joint Project here and data estimating deaths and disappearances in Casanare, Colombia here.