313 results for search: https:/www.hab.cl/buy-aciphex-baikal-pharmacycom-rtlx/feed/rss2/tchad-faqs-fr
How We Choose Projects
Welcoming a New Board Member
Mortality in the DDS Prisons in Chad, 1985–1988
Patrick Ball (2014). Human Rights Data Analysis Group. August 22, 2014. © 2014 HRDAG. Creative Commons BY-NC-SA.
Using Data to Reveal Human Rights Abuses
Profile touching on HRDAG’s work on the trial and conviction of Hissène Habré, its US Policing Project, data integrity, data archaeology and more.
Accountability at home and abroad
Letter from the Executive Director
Where Stats and Rights Thrive Together
HRDAG and #GivingTuesday 2018
Update on Work in Guatemala and the AHPN
La estadística de mortalidad del conflicto en Perú
HRDAG Retreat 2022
Letter from Alejandro Valencia Villa
How public involvement can improve the science of AI
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
As AI systems from decision-making algorithms to generative AI are deployed more widely, computer scientists and social scientists alike are being called on to provide trustworthy quantitative evaluations of AI safety and reliability. These calls have included demands from affected parties to be given a seat at the table of AI evaluation. What, if anything, can public involvement add to the science of AI? In this perspective, we summarize the sociotechnical challenge of evaluating AI systems, which often adapt to multiple layers of social context that shape their outcomes. We then offer guidance for improving the science of AI by engaging lived-experience experts in the design, data collection, and interpretation of scientific evaluations.
Nathan Matias and Megan Price (2025). How public involvement can improve the science of AI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 122, No. 48. 14 November, 2025. © 2025 National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421111122
Watch Now: What is a structural zero?
verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia
The Journal of Open Source Software
The data compiled by the joint JEP-CEV-HRDAG project are publicly available from the Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). The data published by DANE is available in a format that may not be familiar to researchers who have not previously worked with statistical imputation methods. Recognizing this, verdata was created to support researchers in responsibly and correctly using the data despite the potential unfamiliarity of its structure. Researchers can use verdata to verify that the data files they are using in their analyses have not been altered, to replicate the main findings of the technical appendix, and to design new analyses of the conflict in Colombia.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Maria Gargiulo, María Julia Durán, Paula Andrea Amado, and Patrick Ball (2024). verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia. The Journal of Open Source Software. 6 January, 2024. 9(93), 5844, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05844. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Innocence Discovery Lab – Harnessing large language models to surface data buried in wrongful conviction case documents
The Wrongful Conviction Law Review
The recent advent of commercial artificial intelligence (AI), especially in natural language processing (NLP), introduces transformative possibilities for wrongful conviction research. NLP, a pivotal branch of AI that forms the basis for Large Language Models (LLMs), enables computers to interpret human language with a nuanced understanding. This technological advancement is particularly valuable for analyzing the complex language found in case documents associated with wrongful convictions. This paper explores the effectiveness of LLMs in analyzing and extracting data from case documents collected by the Innocence Project New Orleans and the National Registry of Exonerations. The diverse and comprehensive nature of these datasets makes them ideal for assessing the capabilities of LLMs. The findings of this study advance our understanding of how LLMs can be utilized to make wrongful conviction case documents easily accessible by automating the extraction of relevant data.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ayyub Ibrahim, Huy Dao, and Tarak Shah (2024). Innocence Discovery Lab – Harnessing Large Language Models to Surface Data Buried in Wrongful Conviction Case Documents. The Wrongful Conviction Law Review 5 (1):103-25. 31 May, 2024. https://doi.org/10.29173/wclawr112. © 2024 Ayyub Ibrahim, Huy Dao, Tarak Shah.
The use of unstructured data to study police use of force
CHANCE magazine
The challenges and opportunities researchers face when working with unstructured data are hardly new. This article defines unstructured data as data that is not organized according to pre-existing schemas or structures for the sake of statistical analysis. Unstructured data poses a unique challenge for researchers focused on police and policing. The article discusses a definition of unstructured data and two of the primary challenges faced when working with such data, namely information extraction and classification problems. Two case studies are used to illuminate the challenges.
Tarak Shah, Cristian Allen, Ayyub Ibrahim, Harlan Kefalas, and Bavo Stevens (2024). The Use of Unstructured Data to Study Police Use of Force. 5 December, 2024. CHANCE, 37 (4), 18–23. © The American Statistical Association (ASA) and Taylor & Francis Group 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2024.2434437
Shots fired: Can technology really keep us safe from gunfire?
Significance
An expensive American gunshot detection system claims it’s necessary because humans don’t always call the police to report gunfire. But opponents say it’s fatally flawed. To investigate, Bailey Passmore and Larry Barrett analysed data on emergencies within the city of Chicago.
Bailey Passmore and Larry Barrett (2025). Shots fired: Can technology really keep us safe from gunfire? Significance, Volume 22, Issue 4, July 2025, Pages 34–37. 27 May 2025. © Royal Statistical Society 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrssig/qmaf042
