New and Noteworthy

Update of Iraq and Syria Data in New Paper

IOAS-graph-2015This week The Statistical Journal of the IAOS published a new(ish) paper by Megan Price and Patrick Ball. The open-access paper, Selection bias and the statistical patterns of mortality in conflict, is a revisiting and updating of both the Iraq and Syria examples used in an earlier paper, Big Data, Selection Bias, and the Statistical Patterns of Mortality in Conflict, which was published last year in The SAIS Review of International Affairs (JHU Press, 2014).

HRDAG believes that the concerns highlighted by these examples are important for a wide variety of audiences, including both the foreign policy readers reached by The SAIS Review and the international statisticians reached by IOAS’s Journal.

This article integrates the correction and update of the analysis of event size bias in the Iraq Body Count database that was discussed in detail in a blogpost in November 2014. The updated Syria example also includes additional background information and a deeper contextual consideration of that ongoing conflict.

Patrick Ball Honored with Degree at Claremont Graduate University

Patrick Ball with a diploma signifying his honorary degree at Claremont Graduate Universityon May 16, 2015, as university president Deborah Freund applauds.

Patrick Ball with a diploma signifying his honorary degree at Claremont Graduate Universityon May 16, 2015, as university president Deborah Freund applauds.

We’re happy to announce that our executive director, Patrick Ball, has been presented an honorary degree from Claremont Graduate University in Claremont, California. University President Deborah Freund presented the degree to Patrick at the university’s 88th annual commencement ceremony on Saturday, May 16, 2015. The degree conferred was Doctor of Science honoris causa.

“We at CGU are thrilled that Patrick Ball accepted our Honorary Degree invitation and joined us for commencement,” said Thomas Horan, CGU Professor and Director, Center for Information Systems and Technology. “Patrick’s work stands as a model for conducting first-rate statistic analyses (more…)

When Data Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story

Graves in Timor-Leste.

Graves in Timor-Leste.

This blog is a part of International Justice Monitor’s technology for truth series, which focuses on the use of technology for evidence and features views from key proponents in the field.

As highlighted by other posts in this series, emerging technology is increasing the amount and type of information available, in some contexts, to criminal and other investigations. Much of what is produced by these emerging technologies (Facebook posts, tweets, YouTube videos, text messages) falls in the category we refer to as “found” data. By “found” data we mean data not generated for a specific investigation, but instead, that is generated for some unrelated purpose.

Such data are not new or specific to emerging technology: examples include bureaucratic and administrative records, such as the Historic Archive of the National  Police in Guatemala, documents  generated  by the Documentation and Security Directorate (DDS) in Chad, border crossing records kept by the Albanian border guards during the 1999 conflict between Yugoslavia and NATO, and cemetery registries in Colombia. (more…)

Focus on Good Science, not Scientists

We recently learned about an article by Dr Nafeez Ahmed that criticizes the methods and conclusions of the Iraq Body Count (IBC) and the work of Professor Michael Spagat. Dr Ahmed cites our work extensively in support of his arguments, so we think it’s useful for us to reply.

We welcome Dr Ahmed’s summary of various points of scientific debate about mortality due to violence, specifically in Iraq and Colombia. We think these are very important questions for the analysis of data about violent conflict, and indeed, about data analysis more generally. We appreciate his exploration of the technical nuances of this difficult field.

Unfortunately, parts of Dr Ahmed’s article focus on sources of funding that IBC and Professor Spagat have received, and on speculation about how such funding might affect their substantive conclusions. We find such criticism to distract from the important points of scientific debate. (more…)

< | >
  • > HRDAG

    The Human Rights Data Analysis Group is a non-profit, non-partisan organization that applies rigorous science to the analysis of human rights violations around the world.
  • > Recent Stories


    Update of Iraq and Syria Data in New Paper

    Patrick Ball Honored with Degree at Claremont Graduate University

    When Data Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story

    Focus on Good Science, not Scientists

    HRDAG Offers New R Package – dga

    How many police homicides in the US? A reconsideration

    HRDAG Retreat 2015

    BJS Report on Arrest-Related Deaths: True Number Likely Much Greater

    The Great Lessons in Research at the Archive

    Evaluation of the Kosovo Memory Book


    Archives


    x

    You are welcome to use these datasets for your research. If you publish with them, however, we ask that you include the following text: "These are convenience sample data, and as such they are not a statistically representative sample of events in this conflict.  These data do not support conclusions about patterns, trends, or other substantive comparisons (such as over time, space, ethnicity, age, etc.)."

    For reference and further information please see this blogpost about raw data and this blogpost about convenience samples. In addition, we recommend you read the following: Dorofeev, S. and P. Grant (2006). Statistics for Real-Life Sample Surveys. Cambridge University Press; and van Belle, Gerald (2002). Statistical Rules of Thumb. Wiley.

    If you use these data, please cite them with the following reference: